Papacy - Timeline (Collapse All)
Thou are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church. I will give to thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatsoever thou shalt bind upon earth it shall be bound also in heaven. (Matthew 16:19)Feed my sheep. (John 21:16-17)
Compel them to come in. (Luke 14:23)
Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. (Matthew 28:19)
You know, most clement son, that, although you take precedence over all mankind in dignity. Nevertheless, you piously bow the neck to those who have charge of divine affairs and seek from them the means of your salvation.
Robert A. Williams, Jr. The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourses of Conquest. New York: Oxford UP, 1990: 16.
From the start Leo refused to be bogged down in Roman politics. . . . In this way papal authority became real and visible.
Geoffrey Barraclough. The Medieval Papacy. London: Thames and Hudson, 1968: 74-75.
[Because of Gregory,] Latin Christendom had gradually taken shape as a cultural and spiritual unity, a western counterpart to the Christian empire of Constantinople. And because this unity rested on a common devotion to St. Peter, it was natural that the peoples it compromised should look to the pope as its head.
Geoffrey Barraclough. The Medieval Papacy. London: Thames and Hudson, 1968: 51.
[Urban II] had first suggested that distinctions between papal legislative texts could be drawn by comparing those which contained norms of an "immutable character" and those which were drawn up to meet the exigencies of a particular situation.
Robert A.Williams, Jr. The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourses of Conquest. New York: Oxford UP, 1990: 27.
God wills it! God wills it!
James Brundage. Crusades: A Document Survey Milwaukee: Marquette UP,1962: 17.
The earth is shaken because the Lord of heaven is losing his land, the land in which he appeared to men . . . Alas, if there should be none to withstand him, he [the infidel] will soon invade the very city of the living God.
James Brundage. Crusades: A Document Survey. Milwaukee: Marquette UP, 1962: 91.
With its emphasis on the pope’s legislative and dispensing powers, [Gratian's work] became the starting-point for the development of ecclesiastical law in the twelfth century.
Geoffrey Barraclough. The Medieval Papacy. London: Thames and Hudson, 1968: 96.
On the Friday next after the feast of the Assumption of Blessed Mary, he [King Richard] ordered that two thousand seven hundred of the vanquished Turkish hostages be led out of the city and decapitated.
James Brundage. Crusades: A Document Survey. Milwaukee: Marquette UP, 1962: 184.
Innocent III had questioned the propriety of the exercise of power by un-Christians over Christians, but had not denied its legitimacy.
L.C. Green, and Olive P. Dickason. The Law of Nations and the New World. Alberta: U of Alberta P, 1989: 149.
Because you have fared forth for God, and for right, and for justice, therefore you are bound, in so far as you are able, to restore to their own inheritance those who have been unrighteously despoiled.
James Brundage. Crusades: A Document Survey. Milwaukee: Marquette UP, 1962: 199.
Uggucio held that the king’s power came ultimately from the people, a fact which the papal coronation did no more than consecrate. He suggested that the pope’s right to grant title to the emperor stemmed from the breakdown of Roman government rather than from a grant of divine power.
L.C.Green, and Olive P. Dickason. The Law of Nations and the New World. Alberta: U of Alberta P, 1989: 148.
[Johannes Falkenberg, spokesman for the Knights] described the peoples of both nations as idolaters, "heretics and shameless dogs who have returned to the vomit of their infidelity."
Robert A.Williams, Jr. The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourses of Conquest. New York: Oxford UP, 1990: 64.
He was also the first pope to claim the right to dispose of benefices by papal provision simply and solely by reason of his plentitude of power.
Geoffrey Barraclough. The Medieval Papacy. London: Thames and Hudson, 1968: 114.
Men can select rulers for themselves. . . . Sovereignty, possessions, and jurisdiction can exist licitly, without sin, among infidels, as well as among the faithful.
James Muldoon, ed. The Expansion of Europe: The First Phase. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1977: 191.
They are created by God, their only chance of salvation lies in God. . . . In this sense both pagans and Christians are part of the Ecclesia.
Michael Wilks. The Problem of Sovereignty in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1964: 419.
If the ruler was going to act above the law, it must be for a just cause. Once he begins to act absolutely without a good reason for doing so, or if he continues when the state of emergency is past, he ceases to be the embodiment of the public good.
Michael Wilks. The Problem of Sovereignty in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1964: 222.
Certainly anyone who denies that the temporal sword is in the power of Peter has not paid heed to the words of the Lord. . . . Both then are in the power of the Church, the material sword and the spiritual. But the one is exercised for the church, the other by the church, the one by the hand of the priest, the other by the hand of kings and soldiers, though at the will and sufferance of the priest. One sword ought to be under the other and the temporal authority subject to the spiritual.
Robert A.Williams, Jr. The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourses of Conquest. New York: Oxford UP, 1990: 29
Today there is no jurisdiction nor any other power or dominion among infidels, since, as his [Christ’s] opinion states, they are fundamentally incapable of possessing them.
James Muldoon, ed. The Expansion of Europe: The First Phase. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1977: 203.
Where the name of Christ had never been known, Christ is now worshipped, and where from the beginning God was unknown, now He is known and adored.
James Muldoon, ed. The Expansion of Europe: The First Phase. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P, 1977: 54.
But since, as we are informed, although the king and infante aforesaid. . . . fearing lest strangers induced by covetousness should sail to those parts, and desiring to usurp to themselves . . . should therefore, either for the sake of gain or through malice, carry or transmit irons, arms . . .
Frances Gardiner Davenport, ed. European Treaties bearing on the History of the United States and its Dependencies to 1648. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1917: 9.
Alexander’s bulls resolved both legal problems raised by Columbus’s voyage—the rights of Spain in relation to the barbarous peoples of the islands discovered and the rights of Spain in relation to Portugal—firmly in favor of the Spanish Crown.
Robert A. Williams, Jr. The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourses of Conquest. New York: Oxford UP, 1990: 79.
May 3: Inter caetera divinai and Inter caetera I are written and reaffirm Eugene’s favoritism of Spain. The bulls recognize that Portugal has rights to some of the land in the New World but allow Spain to conquer all remaining land and peoples.Let no one, therefore, infringe. . . . Should anyone presume to do so, be it known to him that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and the blessed apostles Peter and Paul.
Frances Gardiner Davenport, ed. European Treaties bearing on the History of the United States and its Dependencies to 1648. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1917: 56.
May 4: Inter caetera II is written to redefine and specify which lines of latitude and longitude are to be granted to Spain and to Portugal. While basically restating the entire Inter caetera I and divinai¸ it does not specifically name Portugal as the other nation represented in the New World. This omission of Portugal reaffirms Spain’s power to influence the papacy and is the beginning of the weakening powers of Portugal in America.
With this proviso however that none of the islands and mainlands, found and to be found, discovered and to be discovered, beyond that said line towards the west and south, be in the actual possession of any Christian king or prince.
Frances Gardiner Davenport, ed. European Treaties bearing on the History of the United States and its Dependencies to 1648. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1917: 76.
Item, in order that the said line or bound of the said division may be made straight and as nearly as possible the said distance of three hundred and seventy leagues west of the Cape Verde Islands, as hereinbefore stated, the said representatives of both the said parties agree and assent [to these lines of demarcation].
Frances Gardiner Davenport, ed. European Treaties bearing on the History of the United States and its Dependencies to 1648. Washington: Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1917: 96.
The pope’s grant to Spain of title to the Americas was "baseless" and could not affect the inherent rights of the Indian inhabitants.
Robert A.Williams, Jr. The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourses of Conquest. New York: Oxford UP, 1990: 97.
Paul III decreed that Amerindians were not to be treated as dumb brutes created for our service. . .[but] as true men.
L.C. Green and Olive P. Dickason. The Law of Nations and the New World. Alberta: U of Alberta P, 1989: 18.